Culture, conceptive technology, and nursing

References 

1. Baird, P.A., 1996. Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction. Annual Review of Medicine 47, 107–116.
2. Balsamo, A., 1996. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
3. Barnard, A., 1996. Technology and nursing: An anatomy of definition. International Journal of Nursing Studies 33, 433–441.
4. Becker, G., 1994. Metaphors in disrupted lives: Infertility and cultural constructions of continuity. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8, 383–410.
5. Becker, G., Nachtigall, R.D., 1991. Ambiguous responsibility in the doctor-patient relationship: The case of infertility. Social Science and Medicine 32, 875–885.
6. Becker, G., Nachtigall, R.D., 1992. Eager for medicalization: The social production of infertility as a disease. Sociology of Health and Illness 14, 456–471.
7. Bowman, M.C., Saunders, D.M., 1994. Community attitudes to maternal age and pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: Too old at 50 years? Human Reproduction 9, 167–171.
8. Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohn, E., Kidder, L., 1982. Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist 37, 368–84.
9. Bush, C.G., 1983. Women and the assessment of technology: To think, to be, to unthink, to free. In: Rothschild, J., (Ed.), Machina Ex Dea: Feminist perceptives on technology. Pergamon Press, New York. pp. 151–170.
10. Casper, M., Koenig, B.A., 1996. Reconfiguring nature and culture: Intersections of medical anthropology and technoscience studies. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10, 523–536.
11. Drewett, R.F., 1994. Uncertain comforts: The justification for treating infertility. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12, 173–178.
12. Duden, B., 1993. Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Fagerhaugh, S.Y., Strauss, A., Suczek, B., Wiener, C., 1987. Hazards in hospital care: Ensuring patient safety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
14. Farquhar, D., 1996. The other machine: Discourse and reproductive technologies. Routledge, New York.
15. Forsythe, D.E., 1996. New bottles, old wine: Hidden cultural assumptions in a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10, 551–574.
16. Frank, A.W., 1995. The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
17. Freemantle, N., Watt, I., 1995. Assisted conception techniques: On what basis do health technologies become routinely available when they have been assessed as effective? Intentional Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 11, 786–794.
18. Gill, R., Grint, K., 1995. The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. In: Grint, K., Gill, R. (Eds), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. Taylor and Francis, New York. pp. 1–28.
19. Greil, A.L., Leitko, T.A., Porter, K.L., 1988. Infertility: His and hers. Gender and Society 2, 172–199.
20. Hanmer, J., 1987. Reproduction trends and the emergence of moral panic. Social Science and Medicine 25, 697–704.
21. Harding, S., 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from womens lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
22. Hillman, J., 1983. Healing fiction. Station Hill, Barrytown, NY.
23. Hubner, M.K., 1989. Cancer and infertility: Longing for life. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 7, 1–18.
24. Humphrey, M., Humphrey, H., 1986. A fresh look at genealogical bewilderment. British Journal of Medical Psychology 59, 133–140.
25. Jarow, J.P., 1994. Life-threatening conditions associated with male infertility. Urologic Clinics of North America 21, 409–415.
26. Kluge, E., 1994. Reproductive technology and postmenopausal motherhood. Canadian Medical Association Journal 151, 353, 355.
27. Kopitzke, E.J., Berg, B.J., Wilson, J.F., Owens, D., 1991. Physical and emotional stress associated with components of the infertility investigation: Perspectives of professionals and patients. Fertility and Sterility 55, 1137–1143.
28. Lloyd, M., 1997. The language of reproduction: Is it doctored? Qualitative Health Research 7, 184–201.
29. Lorber, J., 1987. In vitro fertilization and gender politics. Women and Health 13, 117–133.
30. Lorber, J., 1989. Choice, gift, or patriarchal bargain? Womens consent to in vitro fertilization in male infertility. Hypatia 4, 23–36.
31. Meerabeau, L., 1991. Husbands participation in fertility treatment: They also serve who only stand and wait. Sociology of Health and Illness 13, 396–410.
32. Miall, C.E., 1986. The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems 33, 268–285.
33. Morgall, J.M., 1993. Technology assessment: A feminist perspective. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
34. Mori, T., 1994. Post-menopausal pregnancy is permissible for women below 60 years of age. Human Reproduction 9, 187.
35. Parks, J.A., 1996. A closer look at reproductive technology and postmenopausal motherhood (comment). Canadian Medical Association Journal 154, 1189–1191.
36. Robinson, I., 1990. Personal narratives, social careers and medical courses: Analyzing life trajectories in autobiographies of people with multiple sclerosis. Social Science and Medicine 30, 1173–1186.
37. Sandelowski, M., 1993. With child in mind: Studies of the personal encounter with infertility. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
38. Sandelowski, M., 1997. Exploring the gender-technology relation in nursing. Nursing Inquiry 4, 219–228.
39. Sandelowski, M. 1998. Looking to care or caring to look: Technology and the rise of spectacular nursing. Holistic Nursing Practice 12, 1–11. Erratum in 13, 82–84.
40. Sauer, M.V., Paulson, R.J., Lobo, R.A., 1990. A preliminary report on oocyte donation extending reproductive potential to women over 40. New England Journal of Medicine 323, 1157–1160.
41. Saunders, D.M., 1993. Significance of assisted reproductive technology for other areas of medicine. Annals of the Academy of Medicine (Singapore) 22, 158–162.
42. Scritchfield, S.A., 1989. The infertility enterprise: IVF and the technological construction of reproductive impairments. Research in the Sociology of Health Care 8, 61–97.
43. Sharpe, V.A., Faden, A.I., 1996. Appropriateness in patient care: A new conceptual framework. The Milbank Quarterly 74, 115–138.
44. Siegler, M., Osmond, H., 1974. Models of madness and models of medicine. Harper and Row, New York.
45. Spencer, C., 1995. Assisted reproductive technology: A dilemma for the nursing profession. Contemporary Nurse 4, 174–177.
46. Steinberg, D.L., 1990. The depersonalization of women through the administration of in vitro fertilization. In: McNeil, M., Varcoe, I., Yearley, S. (Eds), The New Reproductive Technologies. St. Martins Press, New York. pp. 74–122.
47. Strickler, J., 1992. The new reproductive technology: Problem or solution? Sociology of Health and Illness 14, 111–132.
48. Sweet, V., Servy, E.J., Karow, A.M., 1996. Reproductive issues for men with cancer: Technology and nursing management. Oncology Nursing Forum 23, 51–58.
49. Ten Have, H.M.J., 1995. Medical technology assessment and ethics: Ambivalent relations. Hastings Center Report 25, 13–19.
50. Van Den Ekker, O.B.A., 1984. Something old, something new, something borrowed, and something taboo. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12, 179–188.
51. Van Der Ploeg, I., 1995. Hermaphrodite patients: In vitro fertilization and the transformation of male infertility. Science, Technology, and Human Values 20, 460–481.
52. Wailoo, K., 1997. Drawing blood: Technology and disease identity in twentieth-century America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
53. Winkel, C.A., Fossum, G.T., 1993. Current reproductive technology: Considerations for the oncologist. Oncology 7, 40–45.