International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 204-209, 15 August 1998

An analysis and evaluation of Caseys conceptual framework

  • Polly Lee

      Affiliations

    • City University, St. Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7QN, UK

Received 14 November 1997; received in revised form 1 April 1998; accepted 18 May 1998.

Abstract 

In the United Kingdom a nursing model has been developed specifically to assist childrens nurses to work in partnership with children and their families [Casey, 1988. A partnership with child and family. Senior Nurse 8(4), 8–9.]. This model has been accepted and adopted widely in childrens units throughout the UK. However, the model has not undergone rigorous testing to determine its contribution to nursing theory, although other authors have since defined the concept of partnership in both scholarly and measurable ways. Analysis and evaluation of the Partnership Model of nursing reveals that the work is not a nursing model but is actually middle range theory according to Fawcetts analysis [Fawcett, 1995. Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing, 3rd ed. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.] and evaluation of nursing models. Suggestions are offered regarding the future development of the work.

Keywords:  Partnership, Child and family, Model, Analysis, Evaluation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7489(98)00031-5

International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 204-209, 15 August 1998