LetterInclusion of nursing trials in systematic reviews after they have been retracted: Does it happen and what should we do?
Section snippets
Conflicts of interest
Professor Gray is Editor of the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. Professor McKenna is Editor in Chief, Collegian and Associate Editor Women and Birth. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References (1)
- et al.
Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey
BioMed. Central
(2017)
Cited by (11)
Fake news: The research reproducibility crisis
2023, International Journal of Nursing StudiesContinued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem?
2019, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsCitation Excerpt :The phenomenon of continued, positive citation of retracted articles has been investigated over the past 3 decades.6,8,13-15 It has been raised in commentaries and editorials7,12,21-23 and continues to receive attention5 (also see recent article in Wired24). The current study of postretraction citations in radiation oncology found that after retrieval and examination of all available publications, 92% referenced the retracted article as legitimate work.
The inclusion of retracted studies in systematic reviews: A response to Gray et al. (2018)
2018, International Journal of Nursing StudiesScience, bad science, pseudocience and the research in nursing neurosciences
2019, Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria NeurologicaOur Responsibility for Understanding Retractions
2022, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.