Letter
Inclusion of nursing trials in systematic reviews after they have been retracted: Does it happen and what should we do?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Conflicts of interest

Professor Gray is Editor of the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. Professor McKenna is Editor in Chief, Collegian and Associate Editor Women and Birth. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References (1)

  • A. Bozzo et al.

    Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey

    BioMed. Central

    (2017)

Cited by (11)

  • Fake news: The research reproducibility crisis

    2023, International Journal of Nursing Studies
  • Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem?

    2019, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The phenomenon of continued, positive citation of retracted articles has been investigated over the past 3 decades.6,8,13-15 It has been raised in commentaries and editorials7,12,21-23 and continues to receive attention5 (also see recent article in Wired24). The current study of postretraction citations in radiation oncology found that after retrieval and examination of all available publications, 92% referenced the retracted article as legitimate work.

  • Science, bad science, pseudocience and the research in nursing neurosciences

    2019, Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Neurologica
  • Our Responsibility for Understanding Retractions

    2022, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text