ReviewMethods to determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tubes: An integrative review
Section snippets
Background
Gastric feeding is the most preferred route of tube feeding (Gottrand and Sullivan, 2010). Feeding patients via NGT involves introducing a thin tube through the nostril, down the esophagus, and into the stomach. The process is usually quick and although somewhat unpleasant, is usually well tolerated (Medlin, 2012). NGT can be used for aspiration of gastric residues or for feeding. In the adult population, tubes for feeding are of small diameter (8–12 Fr) and are manufactured with polyurethane,
Methods
We conducted an integrative review using the population, intervention of interest, comparison and outcomes (PICO) strategy (Santos et al., 2007). The PICO question for this review was: “In adults requiring enteral nutrition via NGT (P), which external landmark measurements used to determine ideal placement of the nasogastric feeding tube (I) (C) are most accurate (O)?”
Search methods
A search of the literature was conducted in February and March 2015. The search included articles having all levels of evidence. The Johns Hopkins Strength of the Evidence method (Newhouse et al., 2005) was used to analyze the evidence (Table 1). The studies were selected, analyzed, and the results synthesized.
The databases searched were: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Key words used for searching
Results
Our search strategy (Fig. 1) produced a total of 5011 articles as follows: CINAHL = 622, Cochrane Library = 25, JBI = 36, PubMed = 559, SCOPUS = 531, and Web of Science = 3238 (Fig. 1). We excluded 4864 based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were included if they described measurement of external landmarks to determine position of a NGT. Studies were excluded if they did not include measurement of external landmarks; were carried out in neonates and children; used other methods, such as
Limitations
This review summarizes information on methods to determine the insertion internal length of NGT in adults. Several methodologies were described and there may have been recommendation bias. Several studies contained small samples sizes and groups that may not be directly comparable. For instance, the Hanson (1979) study was composed of cadavers. We considered that all studies were equally reliable. However, the methods were heterogeneous, which may have led to a biased conclusion.
Conclusion
The literature describes four competing methods for measuring the insertion internal length of NGT in adults: NEX, Hanson, GWNUF, and XEN + 10 cm. Four studies demonstrated that NEX is not a safe method, may actually cause harm, and should no longer be taught or used in practice. Hanson's method was shown by Ellett et al. (2005) to be less safe than GWNUF because the tube tip more often lies in the esophagus. In addition, for patients with larger external dimensions, Hanson's method yields shorter
Implications for future research
- •
Randomized controlled trials by using larger sample sizes are needed to determine the accuracy of NGT method for feeding in adults.
- •
Dissemination of knowledge produced by evidence-based practice is vital to avoid mistakes in the development of policies and protocols that guide patient care.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Science Without Borders Program, CNPq, Brazil and the Illinois State University (ISU), IL, USA for the use of Milner Library, to perform the collection of study data. Authors are also grateful to Prof. Sandro Guedes de Oliveira, from the “Gleb Wataghin” Physics Institute, University of Campinas, for the discussion on the comparison of Hanson's method and NEX. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and
References (42)
- et al.
Inadvertent insertion of nasogastric tube into the brain stem and spinal cord after endoscopic skull base surgery
Am. J. Otolaryngol.
(2012) - et al.
Enteral access in adults
Clin. Nutr.
(2015) - et al.
Pneumothorax after nasogastric tube insertion
JRSM Short Rep.
(2011) - et al.
Factors influencing evidence-based practice for community nurses
Br. J. Commun. Nurs.
(2015) - et al.
Practical procedures for nurses: inserting a nasogastric tube
Nurs. Times
(1999) Caring for the patient with a nasogastric tube
Nurs. Stand.
(2005)A guide to nasogastric tube insertion
Nurs. Times
(2000)- et al.
Application of a manometric technique to verify nasogastric tube placement in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients
- et al.
Potential risk of malposition of nasogastric tube using nose-ear-xiphoid measurement
PLOS ONE
(2014) Trusted Evidence. Informed Decisions. Better Health. Standards for Cochrane Reviews
(2015)