Distress in working on dementia wards – A threat to compassionate care: A grounded theory study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Nurses and health care workers are under increasing scrutiny from the general public and other professionals over their capacity for compassion. For example, in the UK, recruitment of nurses includes assessment of compassion through ‘Values Based Recruitment’. However, compassionate care can be hindered when working in very challenging and pressurised environments. The study aimed to explore the experiences of managing work pressures in front-line NHS staff caring for older adults with dementia. One aspect of the analysis was to explore the factors that facilitate or hinder self-compassion and mindfulness, since these ways of responding to extreme pressure are likely to facilitate compassion towards others.

Method

Ten front-line staff (a mixture of nurses and Health Care Assistants) from three inpatient dementia wards took part in qualitative interviews which were then analysed using constructivist grounded theory methods.

Results

A theoretical framework was generated which highlighted the role of structural and interpersonal types of work pressure on individual responses and ways of managing pressure. A range of helpful and unhelpful strategies were employed and although many participants appreciated the importance of taking time to process and reflect on difficult emotions and experiences during work, there were significant structural and personal barriers to practicing mindfulness and self-compassion more fully. A sense of professionalism along with various organisational factors meant that much processing of difficult emotions had to take place largely out of work hours.

Conclusions

Recruiting staff with high levels of compassion and training compassion to existing staff are not likely to significantly improve compassionate care alone in the context of extremely challenging work environments. Rather, organisational changes need to be made to model and reward self-compassion; staff training should focus on self-compassion and mindfulness, without which compassion to others is hindered. Strong professional values which may instil in care staff a belief in not displaying emotions at work should be considered carefully by professional bodies in order to provide guidance from pre-qualification onwards about how to balance professional conduct with appropriate expression of emotion in response to extreme situations.

Introduction

There are an estimated 44.4 million people living with dementia worldwide (Alzheimer's Disease International, n.d.) with the majority (62%) living in developing countries. In the UK 850,000 people are living with dementia (Alzheimer's Society, 2015), posing one of the most significant challenges for UK health services.

Dementia care has been under scrutiny in the UK press and in government and policy circles. The ‘systemic failings’ identified in Mid-Staffordshire by the Francis Report (an independent public inquiry) affected many people with dementia in the hospitals concerned, with issues around the lack of compassionate care applying particularly to this population. Following the Francis Report, there has been a push towards ‘compassionate care’ in the UK National Health Service (NHS) with NHS Trusts investing in both internal and external bodies to train staff to increase their levels of compassion. Training providers commissioned by the NHS are now required to adopt ‘Values Based Recruitment’, “an approach which attracts and recruits students, trainees and employees on the basis that their individual values and behaviours align with the values of the NHS Constitution” (Health Education England, n.d.). Those values are putting patients first, valuing every person, a commitment to quality care, striving to improve lives, inclusion and compassion (Health Education England, 2014). However, the conceptualisation of compassion as a trait, which is either present or absent in an individual, is contrary to evidence that both nurses (Smith, 1995) and doctors (Shapiro, 2008) tend to begin their training with good levels of compassion but that this diminishes either during the course of training or in the early years after qualifying (Maben et al., 2007). It is therefore important “to understand what interferes with learners’ impulses and desires to express empathy towards patients” (Shapiro, 2008). One likely hindrance is the nature of the work environment itself.

Front-line staff working with older adults with dementia often work for long hours in stressful, challenging environments (Deutschman, 2000). Research suggests that staff working in older adult inpatient services are exposed to different types of stressors compared to those in outpatient and community services (Pinner et al., 2011). Caring for older adults with dementia can be exceptionally stressful due to the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia which can sometimes result in abusive behaviour towards staff (Beck and Shue, 1994). For staff working with older adults with dementia, client aggression and threat appraisal have been significantly associated with staff work stress (Rodney, 2000). The management of these behaviours in particular and subsequent staff distress represents a significant part of the workload for older adult services (Lawler, 2002).

A small body of research has examined the ways in which front line staff working with dementia clients experience and respond to work pressure. These have measured stress and coping alongside other variables such as attachment and self-efficacy (Kokkonen et al., 2014) aggression, personality, cognitive appraisal and coping (Rodney, 2000) and turnover (Margallo-Lana et al., 2001). Qualitative approaches have also been used to explore the experience of work-stress and coping by means of participant interview (Clinton et al., 1995) and focus groups (Edberg et al., 2008). Kokkonen et al. (2014) found that attachment insecurity, low self-efficacy and staff attitudes (pessimism) were associated with burnout and that a person centred approach was associated with a greater sense of achievement at work. Similarly, Margallo-Lana et al. (2001) found that positive coping strategies protected against psychological distress, with dementia care nurses being more likely to use positive coping strategies than care assistants. Rodney (2000) found that primary threat appraisal (perceiving the possibility of aggressive behaviour as a threat) was linked to increased stress. Using more qualitative approaches, Edberg et al. (2008) found that a primary driver among dementia care staff was ‘a desire to do the best for the residents to alleviate their suffering and enhance their quality of life’. They describe this however as also the primary source of strain because nurses wanted to do much more than they actually could but were prevented by many factors including environment and challenges associated with caring for people with dementia. Clinton et al. (1995), using a repertory grid approach, found that nurses were aware of stressors in their work and had developed coping behaviours to respond to them. Factor analysis of 30 grids identified 92 stressors, of which client behaviours were the most frequently cited sources of stress with aspects of the organisation, work and the characteristics of clients next most frequent. Even the more qualitative approaches to this area have clearly been underpinned by a ‘coping styles’ approach based on socio-cognitive models. The present study similarly examines responses to work pressure but attempts to look at the data without assuming a coping styles model. In particular the analysis seeks to explore whether self-compassion and mindfulness can be observed in staff strategies for managing work pressure in dementia care and what factors appear to facilitate or hinder use of these techniques, since these strategies are likely to be required in order for nurses to maintain compassion towards patients (Raab, 2014).

Neff et al. (2007) argue that both self-compassion and mindfulness offer a buffer to the harmful effects of stress. Neff (2003) describes self-compassion as an emotionally positive self-attitude that should protect against the negative consequences of self-judgement, isolation and rumination; it is closely related to, and informed by the construct of mindfulness but also incorporates self-kindness and a sense of common humanity. Mindfulness is defined for present purposes as a “moment-to-moment, non-judgmental awareness, cultivated by paying attention in a specific way, that is, in the present moment, and as non-reactively, as non-judgmentally, and as openheartedly as possible” (Kabat-Zinn, 2005, p. 108). Working in a highly demanding occupational environment such as the current NHS, particularly in dementia wards, is likely to pose numerous barriers to self-compassion and mindfulness.

In spite of a wealth of evidence concerning the need for a whole system approach (see Crawford et al., 2014), nurses and health care workers are pressured to meet expectations of both the general public and other professionals to demonstrate compassion despite increasing work pressures (Ashker et al., 2012). Different people, of course, respond differently to challenging work environments. There is evidence that training in managing work pressures using coping style approaches, as well as more contemporary mindfulness-based approaches, can reduce stress (Shapiro and Carlson, 2009). However, it is unclear whether staff intuitively use techniques akin to mindfulness or self-compassion to manage work pressures. With the current emphasis on recruiting staff with high levels of compassion or ‘training’ staff to be more compassionate, little focus has been placed on the structural and interpersonal barriers and facilitators to staff drawing upon their existing capacity for self-compassion, mindfulness and ultimately compassion to others. A focus on training compassion and Values Based Recruitment may therefore be misguided without a greater understanding of what may prevent or hinder the practices of self-compassion and mindfulness.

The study aimed to explore the experiences of managing work pressures in front-line NHS staff caring for older adults with dementia. One aspect of the analysis was to explore the factors that facilitate or hinder self-compassion and mindfulness, since these ways of responding to extreme pressure are likely to facilitate compassion towards others.

Section snippets

Methods

A constructivist grounded theory approach was followed, which acknowledges the subjective role of the researcher in the process of both generating and analysing the data (Charmaz, 2000).

Results

Fig. 1 provides an overall depiction of the categories and the theoretical model which emerged. The model indicates that there were two main types of work pressure experienced by participants which were either structural or interpersonal. These elicited a range of responses from participants, some of which appeared to be helpful and some unhelpful, described in detail below. There were some positive aspects of work as well and these appeared to be linked with eliciting the more helpful types of

Discussion

The analysis suggests that multiple work pressures exist in these dementia care wards which may be viewed as either structural, interpersonal or a combination of both. In line with previous studies of staff experiences of working in dementia settings, there was an overwhelming sense of intense work pressure; examples of work enjoyment were limited. Several participants spoke about having had time off work for stress related issues and there was a very strong sense of the intensity of time

References (41)

  • C.K. Beck et al.

    Interventions for treating disruptive behaviour in demented elderly people

    Nurs. Clin. N. Am.

    (1994)
  • K.D. Neff et al.

    Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning

    J. Res. Pers.

    (2007)
  • L. Aiken et al.

    Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States

    Br. Med. J.

    (2012)
  • Alzheimer's Society (2015) http://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?documentID=341 (accessed...
  • V.E. Ashker et al.

    Work-related emotional stressors and coping strategies that affect the well-being of nurses working in hemodialysis units

    Nephrol. Nurs. J.

    (2012)
  • C. Chambers et al.

    Compassion and Caring in Nursing

    (2009)
  • K. Charmaz

    Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods

  • K. Charmaz

    Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis

    (2006)
  • M. Clinton et al.

    Perceptions of stressors and reported coping strategies in nurses caring for residents with Alzheimer's disease in a dementia unit

    Aust. N. Zeal. J. Ment. Health Nurs.

    (1995)
  • A. Cole-King et al.

    Compassionate care: the theory and the reality

    J. Holist. Healthc.

    (2011)
  • J.K. Connor-Smith et al.

    Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (2007)
  • P. Crawford et al.

    The design of compassionate care

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2014)
  • M. Deutschman

    What you hear when you listen to staff

    Nurs. Homes Long Term Care Manage.

    (2000)
  • I. Dey

    Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry

    (1999)
  • A.K. Edberg et al.

    Strain in nursing care of people with dementia: nurses’ experience in Australia Sweden and United Kingdom

    Aging Ment. Health

    (2008)
  • P. Gilbert

    The Compassionate Mind: A New Approach to Life's Challenges

    (2009)
  • B.G. Glaser et al.

    The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research

    (1967)
  • J. Goodrich

    Supporting hospital staff to provide compassionate care: do Schwartz Center rounds work in English hospitals?

    J. R. Soc. Med.

    (2012)
  • Health Education England (n.d.)...
  • Health Education England

    Values Based Recruitment Framework

    (2014)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Increasing awareness, sensitivity, and empathy for Alzheimer's dementia patients using simulation

      2021, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to a lack of knowledge, negative attitudes of nurses towards patients with dementia has also been identified (Surr et al., 2016; Evripidou et al., 2019; Skaalvik et al., 2010; Surr et al., 2016). Nurses who care for patients with dementia have reported an increase in their stress levels (McPherson et al., 2016). This aligns with Digby et al. (2016) who also reported frustration and emotional exhaustion of nurses when caring for the complex needs of patients with dementia.

    • Compassionate Care in Healthcare Systems: A Systematic Review

      2019, Journal of the National Medical Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      McPherson et al. stated that the inhibiting factors of compassionate care for dimentia patients consist of heavy workload due to work shifts and also the conditions of clients, lack of enough space, lack of independence and resources, extra requirements (physical needs, the rivalry of the colleagues) with each other and permanent changes. The other factors include management patterns, aggression, inferiority feeling, the behavior of colleagues and fear.56 The findings show that compassionate strategy in nursing care practice of British Health Ministry System was designed as 6 C strategy including care, compassion, committment, courage, communication and competency.8

    • Staff Distress Improves by Treating Pain in Nursing Home Patients With Dementia: Results From a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

      2016, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      These symptoms are distressing, not only for the patients but also for the carers, and lead to institutionalization as reflected in the nursing home (NH) population, 80% of whom have dementia.4 Distressing symptoms do not recede with NH admission, and the care for these patients is found to affect formal carers, both emotionally and physically, leading to depression, anxiety, and sleep problems.5 The societal consequences are significant: burnout, sick leave, turnover, and increased economic costs.2,6,7

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +44 01206 228908.

    2

    Current address: Action for Children, Weston Business Centre, Hawkins Road, Colchester CO2 8JX, UK.

    View full text