Nurses’ response to frequency and types of electrocardiography alarms in a non-critical care setting: A descriptive study
Introduction
One of registered nurses’ fundamental roles is to identify signs and symptoms of deterioration in their patients’ condition and act to interrupt continued deterioration. Early recognition of deterioration can logically be assumed to prevent adverse events such as delay in diagnosis and treatment (Considine and Botti, 2004, Taenzer et al., 2011). Many hospitalized patients exhibit signs of clinical deterioration, such as changes in vital signs, prior to experiencing critical events (Gazarian et al., 2010). Increasingly monitoring of vital signs, especially heart rate and rhythm, is accomplished through various continuous monitoring devices, creating a convergence of technology and clinical processes that has profoundly changed clinical practice. Once considered primarily for critical care areas, many forms of sophisticated monitoring are now available on medical surgical units. This proliferation in technology into non-critical care areas redistributes workflow and tasks. However, overall it increases the physical and cognitive demands for nurses as they integrate technology into their work (Militello, 1998).
The importance of detecting early signs of patient deterioration cannot be understated. However, it is also apparent that continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitor alarms are inefficient at alerting clinicians of patient deterioration. Continuous ECG monitoring produces many more false and nuisance alarms than notifications of true clinical events. This results in alarm fatigue and system work-arounds. Applying continuous ECG monitoring to detect deterioration produces a situation that may in fact subvert the nurses’ ability to provide proper clinical surveillance of patients’ conditions (Larson and Brady, 2008). It is important to understand the impact of monitor alarms on nurses’ work in order to inform the appropriate use of continuous ECG monitoring in clinical practice. The purpose of this report is to describe aspects of the nurses’ work on medical surgical units (non-critical care areas) associated with continuous ECG monitoring and their associated alarms.
Section snippets
Deterioration of hospitalized patients
There is a significant body of research demonstrating that many hospitalized patients exhibit signs of clinical deterioration, such as changes in vital signs, prior to experiencing a cardio-pulmonary arrest (CPA) or transfer to an intensive care unit (Buist et al., 2004, DeVita et al., 2010, Goldhill et al., 1999). Other signs of clinical deterioration supported by the research include changes in level of consciousness (LOC) or mental status, and changes in oxygenation status (Gazarian et al.,
Indication for continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring
Despite the limitations of ECG monitoring to detect patient deterioration, it is the most prevalent method of monitoring patients in hospitals today. It is common practice for patients to have continuous ECG monitoring applied without consideration of clinical indications (Funk et al., 2010). There is evidence that continuous ECG monitoring is of use in specific patient populations, such as those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and that sophisticated monitoring parameters such as ST segment
Monitor alarms
Attendant to the prevalence of continuous ECG monitoring are their associated alarms. Several issues have been documented related to clinical alarms. Alarm systems are highly sensitive yet lack specificity (Chambrin et al., 1999), resulting in rates of false alarms as high as 99.4% (Atzema et al., 2006, Chambrin et al., 1999). The proliferation of monitoring equipment and frequency of alarms creates risks for the development of staff desensitization to the alarms or worse, work-a-rounds such as
Design
The data reported are part of a prospective, descriptive project designed to elicit information on how nurses identify and respond to monitor alarms. The intent of this article is to report on the observational data of registered nurses in a milieu of monitor alarms. Specifically, this researcher addressed nurses’ routine practices related to ECG monitoring, the frequency and types of ECG monitoring alarms the nurses encountered in clinical practice, the level of intervention chosen by nurses
Routine nursing practice related to monitor alarms.
The usual nurse to patient ratio was 1:3 (range 2–3) with anywhere from none to three of those patients on ECG monitoring. There are no designated monitor watchers or pagers to alert nurses of an alarm. There is a central monitor station that displays each patient's rate and rhythm in two leads. Each unit has additional monitor displays placed throughout the unit. Nurses are able to adjust the set up and alarm settings at the central monitor station. The study units were using telemetry
Discussion
Key findings from the observation of nine nurses caring for 37 patients receiving continuous ECG monitoring for a total of 54 h are as follows.
Nurses routine practices related to ECG monitoring continue to reveal gaps in practice related to alarm management. Checking alarm parameters and volumes at the beginning of a shift ensures that all alarms are on and audible. Skipping this procedure at the beginning of a shift leaves a nurse vulnerable to missing an important alarm; yet the RNs in 7 out
Limitations
The findings from this study represent a description of practice in one institution among nine participants. This small sample size and use of only one site limit the generalizability of the findings. The mean age of the sample (29.75 years) was younger than the mean age of the nurses at the study institution (45.36) which may further limit generalizability. In addition, because many alarms sounded simultaneously or overlapped, observer's records of alarms were imprecise as compared to the
Implications and recommendations
The findings from this study represent a snapshot of the practice related to alarm management in a large academic medical center. Despite the large number of alarms that nurses did not to respond to, this study demonstrates the range of nursing work associated with responding to alarms. Responding to alarms included patient assessment, consultation and collaboration activities, in addition to managing the equipment. Nursing activities often overlapped and one nursing activity might not have
Conclusions
Much has been written about the need to improve vital sign monitoring among hospitalized patients and identify patients at risk of deterioration (DeVita et al., 2010). Clinicians and researchers recognize that changes in heart rate or rhythm are often not the first or only signs of deterioration (Gazarian et al., 2010, Taenzer et al., 2011). Despite these clinical observations, continuous ECG monitoring is the most prevalent type of monitoring in hospitals today and is used in situations for
References (23)
- et al.
ALARMED: adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the Emergency Department. A pilot study
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2006) - et al.
Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study
Resuscitation
(2004) - et al.
Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis—a consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid response systems
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Practice standards for ECG monitoring in hospital settings: executive summary and guide for implementation
Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
(2006) - et al.
Unnecessary arrhythmia monitoring and underutilization of ischemia and QT interval monitoring in current clinical practice: baseline results of the Practical Use of the Latest Standards for Electrocardiography trial
Journal of Electrocardiology
(2010) - et al.
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
(2009) - et al.
Electrocardiographic monitoring in the hospitalized patient: a diagnostic intervention of uncertain clinical impact
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2008) - et al.
Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload
Ergonomics
(2000) - et al.
Multicentric study of monitoring alarms in the adult intensive care unit (ICU): a descriptive analysis
Intensive Care Medicine
(1999) - et al.
Who, when and where? Identification of patients at risk of an in-hospital adverse event: implications for nursing practice
International Journal of Nursing Practice
(2004)
Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation
Cited by (38)
Reducing ICU Utilization, Length of Stay, and Cost by Optimizing the Clinical Use of Continuous Monitoring System Technology in the Hospital
2022, American Journal of MedicineCitation Excerpt :The dramatic improvements in ICU transfer rates, length of hospital length of stay, and cost savings were sustained over a 2-year period across all adult medical-surgical units at the study site. Most previous studies are observational and qualitative with more proximal endpoints focused on feasibility,9 nurse perceptions,1,10 predictive performance,11-13 and alarm burden.14-16 Some previous studies measured clinical outcomes and cost and demonstrated improved outcomes, but over shorter periods of time, on a limited number of units or focused on a specific specialty (ie, orthopedics or stroke), and with small sample sizes.3
Nurses’ responses to monitor alarms in an intensive care unit: An observational study
2020, Intensive and Critical Care NursingCitation Excerpt :This high sensitivity leads to an increase in the frequency and diversity of the alarms. Non-actionable or false alarms are thought to be especially problematic (Casey et al., 2018; Gazarian, 2014; Petersen and Costanzo, 2017). Nurses show a high level of cognitive efforts to synthesize the large quantities of information obtained from different parameters (Shanmugham et al., 2018).
Evaluation of Telemetry Utilization on Medical-Surgical Units
2019, Nursing Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Benjamin and colleagues25 corroborated this findings noting that of 1559 monitored days for 501 patients, 35% (548 days) were not supported by AHA guidelines. Observational studies conducted by Gazarian and colleagues31 and Gazarian32 with the same data but different research questions explored nurses’ behaviors and attitudes about responding to alarms. Authors concluded that acknowledging and responding to alarms requires cognitive processing involving recognizing how important the alarm is, how reliable it is, where it is coming from, and who else might be responding.4,30–32
The impact of continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in hospitals: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
2018, International Journal of Nursing StudiesAdvocating for Greater Usability in Clinical Technologies: The Role of the Practicing Nurse
2018, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :There is evidence of serious unintended consequences from health information technologies.21–24 These problems are serious and include alert fatigue,25–27 administration of multiple does of the same medication28 or the wrong medication,15 difficulty determining which medications are due,28 and omission of scheduled medication administration.28 Given the complexity, major system changes, additional workload, and unintended consequences, health care providers are increasingly frustrated with technologies they find difficult to use.18,29