Musculoskeletal pain among critical-care nurses by availability and use of patient lifting equipment: An analysis of cross-sectional survey data
Introduction
Unsafe patient handling is a major risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries among nurses (Waters et al., 2006). Each year, more than 10,000 nurses in the United States experience work-related musculoskeletal disorders resulting in lost work days and nurses rank among the top five occupations for musculoskeletal disorders (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010). Injuries from patient handling tasks account for 31–66% of all musculoskeletal injuries among healthcare workers (D’Arcy et al., 2012, Kim et al., 2012, Pompeii et al., 2009).
Use of mechanical patient lifting equipment can reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury from patient handling. Biomechanical and lift intervention studies have shown significant reductions in biomechanical stress, musculoskeletal discomfort, injury rates, and workers compensation costs (Engst et al., 2005, Evanoff et al., 2003, Li et al., 2004, Yassi et al., 2001, Zhuang et al., 2000). Eliminating risky manual lifting and promoting the use of adequate lifting equipment have become a key component of safe patient handling policies internationally (American Nurses Association, 2012b, Australian Nursing Federation, 2012, Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia, 2006). Since 2005, 10 states in the United States have enacted safe patient handling legislation that requires provision of patient lifting equipment to prevent musculoskeletal injury among healthcare workers (American Nurses Association, 2012b).
Providing lifts to nurses is the first step in ensuring safe patient handling, and having a lift readily available and having nurses actually use the lift are key to the success of lift interventions. However, lifts are not available in many healthcare settings. Even in settings where lifts are provided, actual lift availability and usage is far from optimal (Lee et al., 2010, Trinkoff et al., 2003). A 2011 survey by the American Nurses Association (2012a) showed that while two thirds of respondents had patient lift and transfer devices available, less than one third reported using the devices frequently.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of lifts on musculoskeletal pain by level of lift availability and lift use. As there are discrepancies between lift provision and actual lift availability and use, the intervention effect may differ by the actual levels of lift availability and lift use. However, this difference has not yet been explored in intervention or observational studies. Three lift variables examined in this study have different characteristics. Lift provision is a purely organizational level variable, determined by whether or not it is provided by the employer. The level of lift availability is primarily an organizational level variable determined by the number and proper maintenance of lifts in the workplace, but may also be affected in part by individual factors such as age, gender, or work status of the nurse. For example, when there is a conflicting demand for these devices, male nurses may give priority of use to their female nurse colleagues. The level of lift use measures actual utilization for patient handling when needed; both organizational and individual factors play roles in the level of actual use (Koppelaar et al., 2011, Rickett et al., 2006).
Section snippets
Study design and population
This study analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2006 among critical-care nurses in the United States (Lee et al., 2010). The original study mailed the survey to 1000 nurses randomly selected from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) membership list; the response rate was 42%. Among initial respondents, the study identified 361 nurses who met the eligibility criteria. Inclusion criteria were critical-care nurses currently employed as staff or charge nurses
Study sample
The study sample (n = 361) characteristics are presented in Table 1. The typical respondent was female, White, married, working in a non-profit community hospital and ICU, at a full-time job on the day shift. Of the sample, 168 (46.5%) reported that their employer provided lifts; among these nurses, lifts were available always to 33 (19.6%), most of the time to 67 (39.9%), often to 19 (11.3%), occasionally to 23 (13.7%), rarely to 21 (12.5%), and never to 2 (1.2%) [missing n = 3]. The 168 nurses
Discussion
This study investigated the effect of patient lifting equipment on musculoskeletal pain by level of lift availability and lift use among U.S. critical-care nurses, using three types of pain outcome measures. The information on the type of lift equipment was not available in this study, but most lifts available to the study participants are likely to be floor-based lifts, given the fact that the survey data were collected in 2006. The study sample presented high prevalence of musculoskeletal
Conclusions
This study investigated the effects of patient lifting equipment on musculoskeletal pain for multiple levels of lift availability and actual use. Overall findings point to the following conclusions: (a) lifts appear to have the strongest potential for reducing work-related pain in the shoulders, and (b) consistent actual availability of lifts and removal of barriers against lift use among nurses may be important co-determinants for the prevention potential of lift interventions. The findings of
References (34)
- et al.
Measuring the physical demands of work in hospital settings: design and implementation of an ergonomics assessment
Applied Ergonomics
(2006) - et al.
Use of mechanical patient lifts decreased musculoskeletal symptoms and injuries among health care workers
Injury Prevention
(2004) - et al.
Development and evaluation of a multifaceted ergonomics program to prevent injuries associated with patient handling tasks
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2006) - et al.
Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
(2005) - et al.
The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons
Social Science and Medicine
(2004) - et al.
Psychophysical assessment of assistive devices for transferring patients/residents
Applied Ergonomics
(2000) - American Nurses Association, 2012a. 2011 Health and safety survey....
- American Nurses Association, 2012b. State legislation on safe patient handling....
- Australian Nursing Federation, 2012. ANF policy: No lifting. http://www.anf.org.au/pdf/policies/P_No_lifting.pdf...
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2009....
An evaluation of a “best practices” musculoskeletal injury prevention program in nursing homes
Injury Prevention
Do assistive devices, training, and workload affect injury incidence? Prevention efforts by nursing homes and back injuries among nursing assistants
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Interventions to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses: a systematic review
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Participatory ergonomics to reduce exposure to psychosocial and physical risk factors for low back pain and neck pain: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Effectiveness of overhead lifting devices in reducing the risk of injury to care staff in extended care facilities
Ergonomics
Reduction in injury rates in nursing personnel through introduction of mechanical lifts in the workplace
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Safety climate and its association with injuries and safety practices in public hospitals in Costa Rica
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Cited by (43)
Physical work conditions and disparities in later life functioning: Potential pathways
2021, SSM - Population HealthFactors associated with lift equipment use during patient lifts and transfers by hospital nurses and nursing care assistants: A prospective observational cohort study
2019, International Journal of Nursing StudiesUsing shared governance to achieve a culture change in safe patient handling
2018, International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma NursingCitation Excerpt :Pain, discomfort, and injuries are potential risks associated with moving patients manually. Using mechanical lifts results in less reported pain (Lee et al., 2013), less pain severity (Price et al., 2013), and less job strain (Lee and Lee, 2017) among nurses. Implementation of mechanical lifts has led to a decrease in staff injury (Cadmus et al., 2011; Hunter et al., 2010) and a decrease in lost days of work (Cadmus et al., 2011; Meek-Sjostrom et al., 2010; Weinel, 2008).