International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 47, Issue 8 , Pages 939-945 , August 2010

Early sheath removal and ambulation in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomised clinical trial

Received 23 March 2009 ,Revised 5 January 2010 ,Accepted 17 January 2010.

References 

  1. Andersen K, Bregendahl M, Kaestel H, Skriver M, Ravkilde J. Haematoma after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery—frequency and risk factors. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2005;4:123–127
  2. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, Baki TT, Gandhi SK, Santos RM, et al. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention 1998–2003. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2006;67(4):556–562
  3. Barkman A, Lunse CP. The effect of early ambulation on patient comfort and delayed bleeding after cardiac angiogram: a pilot study. Heart & Lung. 1994;23(2):112–117
  4. Benson LM, Wunderly D, Perry B, et al. Determining best practice: comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2005;34(2):115–121
  5. Butterfield JS, Fitzgerald JB, Razzaq R, Willard CJ, Ashleigh RJ, England RE, et al. Early mobilization following angioplasty. Clinical Radiology. 2000;55(11):874–877
  6. Chair SY, Taylor-Piliae RE, Lam G, Chan S. Effect of positioning on back pain after coronary angiography. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;42(5):470–478
  7. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KK, Weintraub RM, Kuntz RE, Weinstein MC, et al. Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1993;22(4):1052–1059
  8. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, Feldman D, Satler LF, Pichard AD, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;38(3):638–641
  9. Galli A, Palatnik AM. What is the proper activated clotting time (ACT) at which to remove a femoral sheath after PCI? What are the best “protocols” for sheath removal? Ask the experts. Critical Care Nurse. 2005;25(2):88–95
  10. Heyde GS, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Klees MI, Dijksman LM, et al. Randomised trial comparing same-day discharge with overnight hospital stay after percutaneous coronary intervention results of the elective PCI in outpatient study (EPOS). Circulation. 2007;115(17):2299–2306
  11. Kasthuri R, Karunaratne D, Andrew H, Sumner J, Chalmers N. Day-case peripheral angioplasty using nurse-led admission, discharge, and follow-up procedures: arterial closure devices are not necessary. Clinical Radiology. 2007;62(12):1202–1205
  12. Koch KT, Piek JJ, de Winter RJ, Mulder K, David GK, Lie KI. Early ambulation after coronary angioplasty and stenting with six French guiding catheters and low-dose heparin. American Journal of Cardiology. 1997;80(8):1084–1086
  13. Koreny M, Riedmüller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared to standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(3):350–357
  14. King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI, 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention et al.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51(2):172–209(15)
  15. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Canos DA, Gevorkian N, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. American Journal of Cardiology. 2003;92(8):930–935
  16. Lasevitch R, Melchior R, Gomes V, Berg C, Roman M, Alcalde R, et al. Early discharge using five French guiding catheter for transfemural coronary stenting: a feasibility and safety study (EDU, 5Fr Study). American Journal of Cardiology. 2005;96(6):766–768
  17. Lauck S, Johnson JL, Ratner PA. Self-care behaviour and factors associated with patient outcomes following same-day discharge percutaneous coronary intervention. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2009;8:190–199
  18. Laxson CJ, Titler MG. Drawing coagulation studies from arterial lines: an integrative literature review. American Journal of Critical Care. 1994;3(Jan 1):16–22quiz, 23-4
  19. Lins S, Guffey D, VanRiper S, Kline-Rogers E. Decreasing vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Critical Care Nurse. 2006;26(6):38–46
  20. Lundén MH, Bengtson A, Lundgren SM. Hours during and after coronary intervention and angiography. Clinical Nursing Research. 2006;15(Nov. 4):274–289
  21. Marcucci R, Gori AM, Gensini GF, et al. Intensive antiplatelet therapy for reduction of ischaemic events/Authors’ reply. The Lancet. 2008;372(August 16–August 22 (9638)):531–532
  22. Metz D, Brasselet C, Tabet E, Nazeyrollas P, Tassan-Mangina S, Deschildre A, et al. Immediate femoral sheath removal after 6 French routine coronary angioplasty with a weight-adjusted low-dose heparin: results of a prospective registry. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 1999;11(7):416–420
  23. Niccoli G, Banning AP. Heparin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention: how low dare we go?. Heart. 2002;88(4):331–334
  24. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Dangas G, Fahy M, Na Y, Pocock SJ, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic risk score for major bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral approach. European Heart Journal. 2007;28(16):1936–1945
  25. Pais P. Preventing ischaemic heart disease in developing countries. Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine. 2006;10:85–88
  26. Pooler-Lunse C, Barkman A, Bock BF. Effects of modified positioning and mobilization on back pain and delayed bleeding in patients who had received heparin and undergone angiography: a pilot study. Heart & Lung. 1996;25(2):117–123
  27. Pracyk JB, Wall TC, Longabaugh JP, Tice FD, Hochrein J, Green C, et al. A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention. American Journal of Cardiology. 1998;81(8):970–976
  28. Rezaei-Adaryani M, Ahmadi F, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. The effect of changing position and early ambulation after cardiac catheterization on patients’ outcomes: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;46:1047–1053
  29. Rickli H, Unterweger M, Sütsch G, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Sagmeister M, Ammann P, et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2002;57(3):297–302
  30. Rolley JX, Davidson PM, Salamonson Y, et al. Review of nursing care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient journey approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18(17):2394–2405
  31. Sabo J, Chlan LL, Savik K. Relationships among patient characteristics, comorbidities, and vascular complications post-percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart & Lung. 2008;37(3):190–195
  32. Safian RD, Freed MS, Grines C, Freed M. The Manual of Interventional Cardiology. Package edition. Royal Oak, MI, USA: (Hardcover) Physicians Press; 2001;
  33. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinski EJ, Roubin GS. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional, manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1993;2(5):1273–1279
  34. Selius BA, Subedi R. Urinary retention in adults: diagnosis and initial management. American Family Phisician. 2008;77(5):643–650
  35. Stein TP, Wade CE. Metabolic consequences of muscle disuse atrophy. The Journal of Nutrition. 2005;135(7):1824
  36. Stone G, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME. Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous.coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the ACUITY Trial. The Lancet. 2007;17(Mar, 369):909–917
  37. Tagney J, Lackie D. Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal—what is safe practice? A clinical audit. Nursing in Critical Care. 2005;10(4):167–173
  38. Tron C, Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, Douillet R, Chassaing S, Sanchez-Giron C, et al. Randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral arterial hemostasis after PTCA. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2003;16(3):217–221
  39. Waksman R, King SB, Douglas JS, Shen Y, Ewing H, Mueller L, et al. Predictors of groin complications after balloon and new-device coronary intervention. American Journal of Cardiology. 1995;75(14):886–889
  40. Walker S, Jen C, McCosker F. Comparison of complications in percutaneous coronary intervention patients mobilized at 3, 4 and 6h after sheath removal. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2008;23(5):407–413

PII: S0020-7489(10)00021-0

doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.01.004

International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 47, Issue 8 , Pages 939-945 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution