International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 651-661, May 2010

Misconceptions of positivism and five unnecessary science theoretic mistakes they bring in their train

Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Kungshuset, Lundagård, SE-222 22 Lund, Sweden

Received 23 June 2009; received in revised form 13 November 2009; accepted 18 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Positivism is sometimes rejected for the wrong reasons. Influential textbooks on nursing research and in other disciplines tend to reinforce the misconceptions underlying these rejections. This is problematic, since it provides students of these disciplines with a poor basis for reflecting on epistemological and methodological perspectives. It is particularly common for positivist views on reality and causation to be obscured.

Objectives and design

The first part of this discussion paper identifies and explains the misconceptions about positivism as they appear in two influential textbooks. The second part pinpoints five mistakes these misconceptions easily result in when the researcher adopts an epistemological and methodological standpoint.

Keywords: Epistemology, Methodology, Positivism, Ontology, Cause, Reality, Explanation, Metaphysics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7489(09)00401-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.009

International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 651-661, May 2010