What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review
Section snippets
What is already known about the topic?
- •
The increase in prevalence of long-term conditions requires an integrated approach to promoting and maintaining population health, whilst improving service effectiveness.
- •
Interprofessional working is not always achieved in delivery of healthcare services; this may be due to a variety of reasons.
What this paper adds
- •
Two main factors, team structure and team processes, continue to have an impact on interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care in the 21st century.
- •
Within team structure, team premises, team size and composition and the availability of organisational support are important indicators of successful teamworking. Within team processes, setting clear goals and objectives for the team, ensuring regular team meetings and audit appear to foster effective teamworking.
Methods
For the purpose of this literature review and considering time and cost limitations, we included an electronic search of three bibliographic databases, a web-based search, a hand search of relevant journals, and an ancestry approach (Cooper, 1998).
Many different terms are used to describe the collaborative work between professionals such as ‘interprofessional collaboration’ and ‘teamwork’. Indeed, the terms ‘multiprofessional’, ‘interdisciplinary’ and ‘multidisciplinary’, are often used
Findings
The search yielded a final total of 43 articles. After a preliminary reading of the full papers, ten articles were identified and included in the review. Reasons for excluding 31 articles were: review papers (5); discussion papers (5); not focused on primary or community care (4); not identifying barriers or facilitators to teamwork (17). In addition, the two papers identified through informal channels were not considered in the research synthesis since their findings did not add anything new
Discussion
The analysis of studies included in this review revealed that the structure of the team, including the geographical proximity of team members, its size and composition, and the support an organisation provides, is vital for successful teamworking. Using thematic analysis, the findings were separated into themes and categories to allow in-depth consideration of issues; however it should be noted that these categories are not mutually exclusive, and the functioning of a team will also depend on
Implications for primary and community care team members
Some barriers identified in this review, such as team size and base, may be out of nurses’ control, but others may be more amenable to change. The Department of Health, 2004c, Department of Health, 2004d recent policies Agenda for Change and NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework have provided opportunities for nurse development. Both policies advocate nurses’ role in supporting reward systems, innovation, and implementation of change. In addition, nurses could facilitate the development of team
Conclusion
We conclude that the functions of interprofessional healthcare teams working in the 21st century are complex, being influenced by many interrelating factors. Governmental support for teamwork in healthcare is ongoing, although further work needs to be conducted at both a team and organisation level to ensure that enhancement and maintenance of teamwork leads to an improved quality of healthcare provision over the coming decades. Taking this review's suggestions into consideration may facilitate
References (60)
Power and conflict in intensive care clinical decision making
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
(2003)Spiritual care: a phenomenologic study of critical care nurses
Heart and Lung
(2004)Homeward Bound: A New Course for Community Health
(1992)A simple matter of control? NHS hospital nurses and new management
Journal of Management Studies
(2004)- et al.
Team working and effectiveness in health care
British Journal of Health Care Management
(2000) - et al.
Team Working and Effectiveness in Health Care: Findings from the Health Care Team Effectiveness Project
(2001) Doctors and nurses: stereotypes and stereotype change in interprofessional education
Journal of Interprofessional Care
(1995)- et al.
Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care
Nursing Times
(1987) - et al.
Developing and measuring progress toward collaborative, integrated, interdisciplinary health care teams
Journal of Interprofessional Care
(2004) - Colaizzi, P., 1978. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. Cited in Valle, R., and King, M., 1978....
Decision-making in teams: issues arising from two UK evaluations
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Synthesizing Research
Promoting Better Health
Primary Care: Delivering the Future
The NHS Improvement Plan. Putting People at the Heart of Public Services
Choosing Health: Making Healthier Choices Easier
Agenda for Change: Final Agreement
The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework
Creating a Patient-led NHS. Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan
Primary health care teams: team members’ perceptions of the collaborative process
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods
Journal of Health Services Research Policy
The impact of recent reforms in the UK on interprofessional working in primary care centres
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Teamwork in primary health care: 2. Perspectives from practices
Journal of Interprofessional Care
The Work of the Nursing Team in General Practice
Groups that Work: Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork
Understanding the phenomenological approach to research
Nurse Researcher
Co-ordination and Child Protection
Multidisciplinary communication in the Irish public health nursing service: a study
British Journal of Community Nursing
Doing a Literature Search
Cited by (398)
Suspicion, inclusive leadership and team innovation: A motivated information processing approach
2024, Journal of Business ResearchInfluential factors affecting perceptions of interprofessional collaboration for advancing health outcomes: Insights and recommendations from an international fellowship program
2023, Clinical Epidemiology and Global HealthHealthcare professionals’ experiences of interprofessional collaboration in patient education: A systematic review
2023, Patient Education and CounselingLessons learned: Development of COVID-19 clinical staging models at a large urban research institution
2023, Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceTeam Functioning in Secure Residential Care Facilities: Validation of a Self-Report Measure
2024, Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice