International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 285-292 , March 2004

Be good, sweet maid, and let who can be clever: a counter reformation in English nursing education?

  • E. Meerabeau

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44-20-8331-9150; fax: +44-20-8331-8060

Received 3 October 2002 ,Revised 11 August 2003 ,Accepted 19 September 2003.

References 

  1. Adler N. Wake up to the horror of what nurses do. Nursing Times. 2001;97(10):21
  2. Ball S. Education Reform (A Critical and Poststructural Approach). Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994;
  3. Barker P, Reynolds W, Ward T. The proper focus of nursing (A critique of the ‘caring’ ideology). International Journal of Nursing Studies. 1995;32(4):386–397
  4. Becher T. Governments and Professional Education. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University; 1994;
  5. Bjork IT. Neglected conflicts in the discipline of nursing (perceptions of the importance and value of practical skill). Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;22:6–22
  6. Bradshaw A. The Nurse Apprentice, 1860–1977. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2001;
  7. Burkitt I. Bodies of Thought. London: Sage; 1999;
  8. Davies C. Gender and the Professional Predicament in Nursing. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995;
  9. Davies S, Laker S, Ellis L. Dignity on the Ward (Promoting Excellence in Care). London: Help the Aged; 1999;
  10. Daykin N, Clarke B. They’ll still get the bodily care. Discourses of care and relationships between nurses and health care assistants in the NHS. Sociology of Health and Illness. 2000;22(3):349–363
  11. Department of Health, 1999. Making a Difference. The Stationery Office, London.
  12. Department of Health, 2000. An organisation with a memory, report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. Department of Health, London.
  13. De Swaan A. The Management of Normality. London: Routledge; 1990;
  14. Dingwall R. The Social Organisation of Health Visitor Training. London: Croom Helm; 1977;
  15. Dingwall R, Rafferty A, Webster C. An Introduction to the Social History of Nursing. London: Routledge; 1988;
  16. Douglas M. Purity and Danger. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin; 1966;
  17. Dunlop M. Is a science of caring possible?. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1986;11:661–670
  18. Elias N. The Civilising Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1936;
  19. Etzioni A. The Semi-Professions and their Organization. New York: Free Press; 1969;
  20. Graham H. ‘Prevention and health: Every mother's business’ (a comment on child health policies in the 1970s). In:  Harris C, et al. editor. The Sociology of the Family: New Directions for Britain. Sociological Review Monograph no. 28. University of Keele; 1979;
  21. Habermas J. Neoconservative culture—criticism in the United States and West Germany (an intellectual movement in two political cultures). In:  Bernstein R editors. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1985;
  22. Hallam J. Nursing the Image (Media, Culture and Professional Identity). London: Routledge; 2000;
  23. Harvey G. The Forgiveness of Nature (the Story of Grass). London: Jonathan Cape; 2001;
  24. Hart E. Ghost in the machine. Health Service Journal. 1991;5:20–22
  25. Hinde, J., 1999. V-cs defend nurse training. The Times Higher. 15 January.
  26. Holloway J. The media representation of the (nurse the implications for nursing). In:  Soothill K,  Henry C,  Kendrick K editor. Themes and Perspectives in Nursing. London: Chapman and Hall; 1992;p. 16–40
  27. Isaksen L, Dahle R. The silenced bodywork. In:  Gannik D,  Launso L editor. Disease, Knowledge and Society. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur; 2000;
  28. James N. Care=organisation+physical labour+emotional labour. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1992;14(4):488–509
  29. Jowett, S., 1996. Challenges in vocational education. Paper presented at the BERA conference, September.
  30. Lawler J. Behind the Screens (Nursing, Somology and the Problem of the Body). Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 1991;
  31. Lawson, N., 1999. Nurses deserve to be paid for their skills…. The Observer 17 January.
  32. Littlewood J. Care and ambiguity (towards a concept of nursing). In:  Holden P,  Littlewood J editor. Anthropology and Nursing. London: Routledge; 1991;p. 170–189
  33. Martin, E., 1999. Nursing lesson. The Guardian 19 January.
  34. Meerabeau E. The management of embarrassment and sexuality in health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;29(6):1507–1513
  35. Meerabeau E. Back to the bedpans. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001;34(4):427–435
  36. Melia K. A sociological approach to the analysis of nursing work. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1979;4:57–67
  37. Miers M. Gender Issues and Nursing Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 2000;
  38. Miller WI. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1997;
  39. Morgan D, Scott S. Bodies in a social landscape. In:  Scott S,  Morgan D editor. Body Matters: Essays on the Sociology of the Body. London: Falmer; 1993;p. 1–21
  40. Mowforth . Elitism in nursing. In:  Wilkinson G,  Miers M editor. Power and Nursing Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1999;
  41. Munro R. Casenotes. Nursing Times. 1999;95(21):6
  42. Murray, I., 1999. Back to the bedpans for student nurses. The Times, 16 January: 1.
  43. Palmer, J., 1999. Dobson's revolution to halt nurse exodus. The Mirror, 9 January: 7.
  44. Parker R. Tending and social policy. In:  Goldberg E,  Hatch S editor. A New Look at the Personal Social Services. London: Policy Studies Institute; 1981;
  45. Phillips, M., 1999. How the college girls destroyed nursing. Sunday Times, 10 January.
  46. Phillips, M., 2000. A brilliant way of putting off teachers, police and nurses. Sunday Times, 17 December: 17.
  47. Porter S. Women in a women's job (the gendered experience of nursing). Sociology of Health and Illness. 1992;14(4):510–527
  48. Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage; 1987;
  49. Procter S. The functioning of nursing routines in the management of a transient workforce. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1989;14(3):180–190
  50. Rafferty AM. The Politics of Nursing Knowledge. London: Routledge; 1996;
  51. Rayner C. The devil's in the detail of poor care. Nursing Times. 2001;97(7):17
  52. Reverby S. Ordered to Care (the Dilemma of American Nursing 1850–1945). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987;
  53. Sallis J. School Managers and Governors (Taylor and After). London: Ward Lock Educational; 1977;
  54. Salvage J. Editorial. Nursing Times. 1999;95(3):22
  55. Sewell, B., 1999. Bring on the bedpan brigade. Evening Standard, 12 January: 15.
  56. Shilling C. The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage; 1993;
  57. Skeggs B. Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage; 1997;
  58. Standing Nursing and Midwifery Advisory Committee (SNMAC) 2001. Caring for Older People: a Nursing Priority. Department of Health, London.
  59. Tonkiss F. Analysing discourse. In:  Seale C editors. Researching Society and Culture. London: Sage; 1998;p. 245–260
  60. Traynor M. Morality and self-sacrifice in nursing talk. In:  Robinson J, et al. editor. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Policy and Practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999;p. 141–161
  61. Tronto J. Moral Boundaries. New York: Routledge; 1993;
  62. Twigg J. Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing and Society. 2000;20:389–411
  63. Ungerson C. Women and caring (skills, tasks and taboos). In:  Gamarnikow E, et al. editor. The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann; 1983;p. 62–77
  64. White R. Political regulators in British nursing. In:  White R editors. Political Issues in Nursing: Past, Present and Future. Chichester: John Wiley; 1985;p. 19–43
  65. Wilensky H. The professionalization of everyone?. American Journal of Sociology. 1964;70(Sept):137–158
  66. Williams A. A literature review on the concept of intimacy in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001;33(5):660–667
  67. Williams K. Ideologies of nursing (their meanings and implications). In:  Dingwall R,  McIntosh J editor. Readings in the Sociology of Nursing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1978;
  68. Witz A. Professions and Patriarchy. London: Routledge; 1992;

PII: S0020-7489(03)00153-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.09.002

International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 285-292 , March 2004